Solana wallets differ from Ethereum wallets mainly in terms of network structure, speed, cost, and token standards. While both store private keys and enable users to interact with decentralised applications (dApps), the Solana blockchain is designed for high throughput and low fees, offering a distinct experience.

Solana wallets operate on the Solana network, which uses the Proof of History (PoH) consensus mechanism, enabling faster transaction speeds and significantly lower gas fees compared to Ethereum. This makes Solana wallets ideal for frequent, low-cost transactions like trading NFTs or using DeFi apps.

In terms of token standards, Ethereum wallets support ERC-20 and ERC-721 tokens, while Solana wallets manage SPL tokens, the native standard for tokens on Solana. Wallets like Phantom or Solflare are optimised for SPL tokens and dApps built on the Solana ecosystem.

Additionally, Solana wallets usually require fewer confirmations, resulting in quicker transaction finality. Integration with dApps is seamless, but only compatible with Solana-based applications, unlike multi-chain Ethereum wallets like MetaMask.

Overall, Solana wallets prioritise speed, cost-efficiency, and ease of use within the Solana ecosystem, while Ethereum wallets offer broader interoperability but may face higher fees and slower performance during congestion.